<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Line Out - Comments on &quot;Blipsters&quot;</title>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters</link>
<description> Kyp Malone is sooo blip. Over the weekend, the New York Times broke the news that some black people make/listen to indie rock music, not just jazz and hip hop or whatever. But 40 years after black musicians laid...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:40:56 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:58:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by BR</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>By far the worst article written about music in the NYT!  Offensive to say the least.  Unreal really.  Thought it was a joke at first.</p>]]></description>
<author>BR</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c601925</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c601925</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:54:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by christopher frizzelle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll second that. It really was incredible. The premise was this: not all black people are the same. And there are a lot of professors and musicians and black hipsters quoted in the article, which makes it seem like everyone involved thought the reporter's premise made sense, but that's not necessarily true, because when you take a call from a New York Times reporter, well, you know, you're flattered just to be asked to weigh in, it's the New York Times! But Jesus if it didn't read like a train wreck.</p>]]></description>
<author>christopher frizzelle</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c601953</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c601953</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ari Spool</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I hope next weekend will feature a story on Wiggers.  I've been wanting to learn about this new cultural trend!</p>]]></description>
<author>Ari Spool</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602008</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602008</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:32:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bailee.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I like the term blipster, though, as a tongue-in-cheek description of the hipster/electronic scene.  "Yeah man, Tuesdays at Baltic caters to the blipsters."  When I saw the title of this post, I was hoping you were cultivating some new neologism.</p>

<p>After reading the post, however, I say ick.</p>]]></description>
<author>bailee.</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602018</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602018</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:38:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm confused about this "40 years ago" part. What foundations of white rock'n'roll were black musicians laying down in 1967? The foundations were laid in 1947, not 1967.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602093</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602093</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by josh</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>the NYT even highlighted Seattle blipster, Douglas Martin.</p>]]></description>
<author>josh</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602094</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602094</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by maurice</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice job shoveling shit from the Gawker stable.</p>]]></description>
<author>maurice</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602099</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602099</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:19:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You just know that white boys will try and copy the whole blipster thing. Actin&#8217; all blipsterish. They will be called whipsters.</p>]]></description>
<author>JC</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602109</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602109</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Grandy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Whipsters, that's fantastic!</p>

<p>And also, I first read this on Brooklyn Vegan, but it's hardly Gawker's scoop, it's in the fucking New York Times. Gawker just gets up earlier because of their time zone advantage.</p>]]></description>
<author>Eric Grandy</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602145</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602145</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:36:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by maurice</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No biggy.  Just did a double take seeing "NYT 'discovers'..." two times in the same day on the same story. But I cavil!  Keep up the good work.</p>]]></description>
<author>maurice</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602243</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602243</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Grandy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see. I've reworded it for added value. Thanks.</p>]]></description>
<author>Eric Grandy</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602260</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602260</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by christopher hong</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that <a href="http://www.afropunk.com" rel="nofollow">Afropunk</a> is a great documentary and discussion on race.</p>]]></description>
<author>christopher hong</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602393</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602393</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:40:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by segal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm confused about this "40 years ago" part. What foundations of white rock'n'roll were black musicians laying down in 1967? The foundations were laid in 1947, not 1967</i></p>

<p>Exactly. Right there the writer lose ANY credibility. And as for the premise of the article itself, is it possible for NYT to prove how out of touch and ham-handed it is than this? <br />
Coming up next: the ascent of the Jewish hipster--the Jipster.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>segal</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602549</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602549</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm down with the Japster, though; that sounds kinda cool. I'm gonna change my myspace name to the Japster.</p>]]></description>
<author>Steve</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602652</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602652</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by segal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>Right there the writer lose ANY credibility.</i><br />
Ack. That should be <b>lost</b>.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>segal</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602654</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602654</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deacon Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just the worse garbage that I've read recently.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Deacon Seattle</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602976</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602976</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deacon Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The first hipsters were Jazz muscicians and well, most Jazz musicians were black.  This is all bullshit.</p>]]></description>
<author>Deacon Seattle</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602977</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c602977</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:22:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by segal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism" rel="nofollow">Gnostics</a> were the first hipsters. Maybe.</p>]]></description>
<author>segal</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c603892</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c603892</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:35:15 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by qogdbys lpoixmd</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ijzoqar twsv emvz vjzyxg aomfi gwhtldo lsxupjhy</p>]]></description>
<author>qogdbys lpoixmd</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636123</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636123</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by qogdbys lpoixmd</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ijzoqar twsv emvz vjzyxg aomfi gwhtldo lsxupjhy</p>]]></description>
<author>qogdbys lpoixmd</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636144</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636144</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:56:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by qogdbys lpoixmd</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ijzoqar twsv emvz vjzyxg aomfi gwhtldo lsxupjhy</p>]]></description>
<author>qogdbys lpoixmd</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636169</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636169</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:58:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by qogdbys lpoixmd</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ijzoqar twsv emvz vjzyxg aomfi gwhtldo lsxupjhy</p>]]></description>
<author>qogdbys lpoixmd</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636189</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2007/01/blipsters#c636189</guid>
<category>What the</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:58:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>