??!! Confession Time
posted by on October 12 at 12:20 PM
So you might think I was asked to be part of this very special group today because I actually know what the hell I’m talking about when it comes to music.I am here to dispel that illusion. Don’t get me wrong: I listen to a lot of music, and I like to think I have pretty good musical taste (who doesn’t?). I have pretty broad taste, too—ranging from classic rock to folk to punk rock, electronica, jazz, what have you. My current active listening pool might be relatively limited at any given time (right now mostly just going back and forth between Iron and Wine and Jose Gonzalez), but overall, I’m into all sorts of stuff.
Except here’s the thing: There are some very basic, I daresay seminal (though that word is rather overused and somewhat icky, if you think about it) bands that I’ve just never really listened to. I don’t know why; I know they’re all important and ground-breaking and influential and what have you. I know they’re probably great, and I might find a new favorite album. I know I could go the Library right now and pick up their albums for free, bring them home, and finally get what I’ve been missing. I just haven’t gotten around to it.
So, without further ado, here are a few highlights from my List of Shame:

OK, we’ve all heard that “Bang a Gong” song, so that doesn’t even count. That song is so burned into our culture that it can’t really tell me anything about Marc Bolan as a songwriter or artist or anything, anymore than “Rock and Roll Pt. 2” tells us anything about Gary Glitter (admit it, you hear it and you’re in a sports stadium). But I don’t really think I’ve listened to anything else by this man that Allmusic calls “the primary force in glam rock.” What about his album, Electric Warrior, the album that “essentially kick-started the U.K. glam-rock craze”? I’ve seen that cover around a ton, but never bothered to listen. I’ll get to it one of these days, I swear.

“One of the most mythic and influential cult acts in all of rock & roll.” That pretty much sums it up, don’t it? I mean, is any band (aside from maybe the Beatles and Beach Boys) name-checked more by cooler bands than Chilton and co.? And yet, I swear, I don’t think I’ve ever sat down and listened to them. Maybe heard a song or two on KEXP, but that’s about it. How am I even allowed to play in a band if I haven’t listened to Big Star? Somebody revoke my license.

I’m pretty sure the first I ever heard of Love was Billy Bragg’s cover of “Seven and Seven Is” on Elektra’s 40th anniversary Rubaiyat compilation of 1990, which featured two discs (or cassettes, which was the format I had it in) of then-current Elektra bands covering older Elektra bands. (The Cure covering the Doors, Kronos Quartet covering Television, the Sugarcubes covering… Sailcat? Huh. OK.) I loved the song, and even then, 17 years ago, I totally meant to get into this band Love. I think I probably checked out the original version of “Seven and Seven Is,” but that’s about it. By the time Arthur Lee died last year, I still hadn’t ever sat down with one of their albums. Yes, I suck.

For our last band (I’m sure not the last band that I haven’t listened to that I should have, but the last for today), we go back to the glam, only stateside. I am of that age where my first exposure to David Johansen was via his Buster Poindexter persona—specifically, that sad marker in American culture, the song “Hot Hot Hot” (which the world of television marketing will never allow us to forget, due to the excitement of the word “hot”—particularly good for new summer fashions). I admit, I liked the song (c’mon, I was 11!), but have no need ever to hear it again. But that’s neither here nor there, and not the reason I’ve never taken the time to sit and listen to Johansen’s real contribution to our canon, the band that “created punk rock before there was even a term for it.” From their 1973 debut through their recent reformation, which spawned One Day it Will Please Us to Remember Even This, the Dolls are lauded critically far and wide. They, like all these artists mentioned, have also been cited as an influence time and time again, probably by bands that I love. I have even gone so far as to take a couple of their albums out of the library, and I still have not listened to them. So I guess the whole purpose of this post is to ask: What the hell is wrong with me?
Any ideas?

youre human. you cant listen to everything, even when thats what youre paid to do.
also, frankly, not everything thats "seminal" is, you know, good. listenable. its like how cave drawings were crucial in arriving at monet. though love has some really great stuff, and so does big star, ive never sat w their albums long enough to really personalize them. its OK to understand their relevance in musical evolution--which clearly you do, levi--but not count them in your all-time faves collection.
I stand by my assertion that the Metallica version of "Stone Cold Crazy" off that Elektra comp. is great. Excessive yarling vowel additions aside.
Vaguely knowing your tastes Levi, I think Love is the only band on that list that you should actively pursue. 'Forever Changes' is phenomenal. The songs' lyrics transcend their bald idealism and drug-addled symbolism, and the minimal guitar and percussion arrangements are truly greater than the sum of their parts.
Hey, glad you admit it. I've never listened to Big Star or NY Dolls either. I've heard and enjoyed TRex's best of album, whatever it's called, but none of their "real" records, and I've never bought it. I bought the Love's "Forever Changes" on brand new vinyl and gave it an honest try, but it sounded too dated to me, too obviously floaty-hippie sixties. Sure, it's the sound that everybody else ripped off, but just because other people made it a cliche doesn't mean it's not a cliche. But the lyrics are really weird and cool.
idk. But are you going to Iron&Wine in December at the Moore? Because I am, and I'm excited about it. I use I&W to massage to all the time in lieu of crappy New Age music. My clients love it, and I can handle listening to the same I&W cd four times in a day.
I hate, hate the idea that there are some canonical bands that everyone must like/listen to before being allowed to create/comment on music. Fuck a Big Star, I live in the now!
@6--robert christgau is rolling in his grave.
@5 - Yeah, probably. I&W is one of my faves, but I've still only seen him/them once. (I continue to kick myself for not buying advance tickets for that I&W/Holopaw show at Neumo's a couple years ago)
@6 - word up.
@6: I agree this shouldn't be MANDATORY, but if you're a music critic, it's in your best interest to know the work of a fair number of "seminal/canonical" bands. To NOT do so will only handicap you, but hey, if you're proud of your ahistoricity and ignorance and can still hold a steady gig, then more power to you.
If you're being facetious, then well played.
Hi - send me an address and I'll send you an Electric Warrior CD, that way you'll have more time in your life to enjoy it. :-)
Marc
How funny! I just checked out the two disc Love anthology from the library...
Sounding pretty cool so far, although I think the "Forever Changes" stuff is a bit over-rated...
That's OK. I really hadn't listened much to Jawbreaker until we went on our road trip to Missoula a couple of years ago. Or was it Jawbox? Same diff, right??? There is so much music that has been written and recorded that it is nigh impossible for someone to have heard everything they "should know by now." And who's in charge of deciding what it is everyone should know? Me, I confess I don't know Springsteen beyond the stuff on the radio. I only recently discovered the good Dylan records.
I'll take care of you, Levi. Look for some Yousendit goodness in your mailbox tonight.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).