<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Line Out - Comments on SF-J on Winehouse In The New Yorker: Aural Blackface!</title>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural</link>
<description>Sasha Frere-Jones new piece in this week&apos;s New Yorker about Amy Winehouse is pretty good. As with most of his writing, he does get some thing right. Like this: I bought Winehouse’s first album, “Frank,” in 2004 at a Heathrow...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by clarkj</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Fleet foxes are best new music on pitchfork right now. </p>]]></description>
<author>clarkj</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952349</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952349</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:33:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by cosby</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>sorry if i'm telling something you already know, but sf-j is a dude.  do feel free to call him a bitch when he makes mistakes in his writing, which is often.</p>

<p>i can respect that he wrote this article as no other national music journalist would (3 stars is the new disparaging remark).  too bad he's wrong at points and his punch has no weight behind it, but at least he tried.</p>

<p>also, i said this before, but it remains to be the truth: everything you write about music is taken with a grain of salt when you were once a member of a shitty band like <a href="http://www.discogs.com/artist/UI" rel="nofollow">ui</a>.</p>]]></description>
<author>cosby</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952404</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952404</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:13:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by cosby</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>to be clear, 'you', the member of ui, refers to sf-j and not terry miller.  as far as i know, terry miller was not in the nyc shit sandwich known as ui.</p>]]></description>
<author>cosby</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952410</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952410</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought he was pretty much right on. There's a young audience for this kind of stuff that doesn't know what real soul singing sounds like. She THINKS she's singing soul, or jazz, or whatever it is, but she's all over the place; she's Christina Aguilera with better taste. It IS a pastiche, and it IS aural blackface.<br /><br />
SFJ is getting better and better lately; he's the only mainstream critic worth reading right now.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952427</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952427</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:29:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by terry Miller</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@2 and 3:</p>

<p>i know he's a man,i just like calling him my bitch.</p>

<p>but agreed, absolute terrible writing. I really don't understand how TNY keeps publishing his crap. I think it's cause if they fired him for someone who wrote about real relevant artists, he'd cry racism.</p>

<p>Lately he's only written about hip-hop, without the understanding that it's DEAD. sales and ingenuity-wise.</p>

<p>poor man. poor deluded man.</p>]]></description>
<author>terry Miller</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952461</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952461</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:45:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by godsactionfigure</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I admit Amy Winehouse is an exceptional singer. But I cringe every time I see her in the news. Speaking as a kid who was devastated by Kurt Cobain's death, I think it's extremely irresponsible for "The-powers-that-be" to continue to give her the limelight.</p>

<p>Once they figured out she was a junkie, she should've been shelved and left alone to toil by herself on the independant scene. I wonder if she'd be as big. They shouldn't be marketing her and her story to youth culture as much they do. </p>

<p>God I feel so old typing that. :(</p>

<p>This woman is not a step-up from the Britney Spears role model archetype. More like a step to the right....</p>]]></description>
<author>godsactionfigure</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952482</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952482</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:58:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hip-hop? He writes about POP music. His recent articles have been about Winehouse, Roxy Music, Mary J. Blige, Kate Nash, Led Zeppelin, and Cat Power. Where's all this hip-hop? He's a good, nimble, wide-ranging critic.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952499</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952499</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by terry Miller</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2008/02/11/080211gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Kool Herc.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2008/01/14/080114gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Snoopy Dogg.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2007/12/03/071203gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Hip hop photography.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2007/12/24/071224gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Soulja Boy.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2007/11/26/071126gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">On grime.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/notebook/2007/11/26/071126gonb_GOAT_notebook_frerejones" rel="nofollow">M.I.A.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/reviews/recordings/2007/09/03/070903gore_GOAT_recordings_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Dude 'n' Nem.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2007/08/13/070813crmu_music_frerejones" rel="nofollow">Lil Wayne.</a></p>

<p><br />
i'm sure you get the picture. those were all within the last 6 months.</p>

<p>And I would say mjb is half soul/ half hip hop, but she sold her soul to the devil after 411. </p>

<p>Also, he wrote slams of indie rock claiming it wasn't black enough (?!?!), a terrible piece about johanna newsom and his thing about the "gorillaz-go-peking-opera" was so blatheringly fawning as to be cringe-worthy.</p>]]></description>
<author>terry Miller</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952616</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952616</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:19:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Grandy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought this article was actually pretty good. Not black enough, but good.</p>]]></description>
<author>Eric Grandy</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952622</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952622</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:24:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Nicole</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>SFJ is one of the worst, most asisnine writers in the history of music journalism.  I would take a Jann Wenner five star review of a Mick Jagger solo album more seriously than anything written by that tool.</p>]]></description>
<author>Nicole</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952724</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952724</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:49:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matos W.K.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Calling Joni Mitchell an antecedent along with Jewel et. al. isn't the same thing as equating Joni Mitchell with Jewel et. al. by any means. </p>]]></description>
<author>Matos W.K.</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952756</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952756</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:30:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matos W.K.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Also, editors tend to write photo captions, not columnists.</p>]]></description>
<author>Matos W.K.</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952757</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952757</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by E</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's true that editors usually write captions, but the content is usually something either objective or taken from the article. If not, the author probably suggested it. For an editor to invent something like "aural blackface" would be pretty heavyhanded.<br />
Either way, it's not like the caption's sentiment goes against the article's.</p>]]></description>
<author>E</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952896</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c952896</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ndrwmtsn</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>>gasp!

<p>who gives a fuck if people don't know what "real" soul singing sounds like. doesn't mean they'd like it if they heard it, and it doesn't mean they can't like winehouse</p>

<p>and who gives a fuck if amy winehouse sounds like christina aguilera with better taste (funny, BTW).</p>

<p>xtina hearts dj premier, and since then has been aight with me</p></p>]]></description>
<author>ndrwmtsn</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953026</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953026</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:28:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by j-lon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think SFJ gets this mostly right, and I generally like his writing. </p>

<p>I know it's pop music and the kids probably eat it up, but I just find Whinehouse's chaotic, troubled-girl archetype so tired. It kind of bums me out that so many people seem to eat it up. It's so typically British music tabloid pop.</p>

<p>But they do eat it up. And it's probably a good thing too, because if you took that away, there wouldn't be much left, just a not particularly interesting pomo pastiche on girl groups and soul. It's music that makes "I'm am Shelby Lynne" seem path breaking by comparison.</p>

<p>As for Sharon Jones, she's definitely on the retro side. But that's the point. She's also like what, 52 years old, on the young side of the classic soul moment, but perhaps one of the last people who grew up during that period to come to prominence making soul music.</p>

<p>She's also one of the best live acts I've seen in quite some time. It's comfort food for sure. It doesn't have pretenses to being more. And it tastes fucking good.</p>]]></description>
<author>j-lon</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953140</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953140</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:13:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by circle jerk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>controversy sells magazines... it also increases blog post hits... and free alt-weekly readership.<br />
  <br />
welcome to the big huge POP LIFE CIRCLE JERK...</p>]]></description>
<author>circle jerk</author>
<link>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953352</link>
<guid>http://lineout.thestranger.com/2008/02/sfj_on_winhouse_in_the_new_yorker_aural#c953352</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:55:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
