Line Out Music & Nightlife

Slog

News & Arts

« Now That Somebody Finally Turn... | Maga Bo Tonight at Nectar »

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Chuck Klosterman Wonders: If the Money’s Not Going to Music, Where is it Going?

posted by on April 8 at 15:22 PM

And with a new Esquire essay, “Teenage Music Purchases: Anyone Seen My $4.2 Billion?”, Klosterman shares his simple theory on the matter and asks “What is happening to all the money not being spent on music?”

When the Associated Press did its (now annual) story about How the Music Industry Is Failing this past January, it tried to answer my question with one sentence: “The recording industry has experienced declines in CD album sales for years, in part because of the rise of online file-sharing, but also because consumers have spent more of their leisure dollars on other entertainment, like DVDs and video games.” This is a rational explanation supported by the precipitous commercial rise in both idioms. (Video-game revenue has more than doubled since 2000, and DVD sales grew from $2.5 billion in 2000 to $23.4 billion last year.) The only problem is while CDs, DVDs, and video games are physically similar, and they’re sold in the same outlet, the experiences they offer aren’t logically connected. I don’t see why not having to pay for a Band of Horses album would make a person any more likely to buy a copy of Knocked Up, as opposed to buying four gallons of gas or a pair of sunglasses or a turtle. I don’t think young people swap out items in their “leisure” budget that explicitly. What seems more likely is that this extra $4.2 billion — unequally distributed among all the music fans who didn’t pay for music in 2006 — entered the overall economy in lots of disparate ways. And while we’ll never know exactly where all those bones disappeared, my specific theory is this: A lot of the money not spent on music in the twenty-first century is being used to pay off credit-card debt that was incurred during the nineties. In other words, not paying for In Rainbows today is helping people eliminate the balance they still owe for buying Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness when they were broke in 1995.

Read the whole thing here.

RSS icon Comments

1

1 turtle = 4 gallons of gas?

Posted by Manos | April 8, 2008 4:15 PM
2

One of the less sensical Klosterman columns in recent memory. He should steer clear of economics.

Posted by josh | April 8, 2008 4:46 PM
3

That money is going toward those allover print hoodies everyone's going to deny they ever wore in 5 years.

Posted by ...And Toy Poodles With Matching Gucci Bags...And Rehabs. | April 8, 2008 4:52 PM
4

@3
thank you for affirming my own personal hatred of the allover print hoodie. i mean, the allover print t-shirt from the GnR/Metallica tour in '91 ('92?) was pretty atrocious, but the Louis Vuitton-esque hoodies have gotta go.

Posted by brian cook | April 8, 2008 5:44 PM
5

if you think that's still something cool to wear, you're playing yourself

Posted by ndrwmtsn | April 8, 2008 11:02 PM
6
Posted by merko | April 9, 2008 8:31 AM
7

LOL @ Melon Collie

Posted by lar | April 9, 2008 9:19 AM
8

2 words come to mind:

elastic good

Posted by Bellevue Ave | April 9, 2008 2:20 PM
9

(for some reason it won't let me post about rings that have tones on phones which operate on a cellular frequency ... i think u must get a lot of spam for that)

I think that the vast majority is going to pay for the use of mobile phones - not sure what else.

Posted by Will in Seattle | April 9, 2008 2:25 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).