Thursday, November 13, 2008

A-G-A-I-N

Posted by Dean Fawkes on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:57 PM

Blur - 'Parklife'

Eric makes quite a good point about economic highs and lows having much less to do with the overall quality of the day's music than we're told, and how leisure music fits into it all.

But is Blur's Parklife a good example?

Put out in the spring of 1994, the album was a massive contrast to the music of the time. Where the rest of the world was invested in Seattle grunge or, say, Midlands grebo, Blur made Parklife, the second part of a trilogy, to fight back, for the most part, America.

"Enough," it said.

Not just to the Seattle sound, its dull and masculine working-class chic, but largely to our country's slow cultural and corporate takeover of Britain.

Earlier in the '90s, Damon Albarn would look out the window and couldn't tell what country he lived in anymore. Megastores. Fast food. Shopping centers. The nation as a brand. It looked like America.

This meant that it's absolutely true that Britpop and an album like Parklife had color and frivolity, or a sense of leisure. But it was also an angry and poisonous call-to-arms.

Sailing through a different historical British music genre with nearly every track, Parklife disguised a savage undercurrent and slipped it into the mainstream, offering songs about millennial apathy ("End Of A Century"), fetishizing of the United States ("Magic America"), and universal, stare-at-ourselves depression ("This Is A Low"), while even "Girls & Boys," one of the most joyous songs Blur has ever written, threw back to grunge-unfriendly gender experimentation, which America's music culture has rarely been comfortable with, and classic '80s synth-pop like Pet Shop Boys or Duran Duran, but updated it with cold-water-in-the-face asides of factory accidents and murderous STDs. Holidays were a scam. "Then it's back to work, A-G-A-I-N!" On the sleeve were photographs of a day at the races, but with vicious dogs.



As much as Parklife had the sound of joy, it seethed as much as it celebrated.

I think it comes down to a disparity of timelines. America and Barack Obama in 2008, you could argue, is Britain and Tony Blair in 1994.

If we're to look at Parklife as a sign of anything, it might not be a good one. Helping to run up to a cultural British left-wing renaissance after ages of seemingly unstoppable right-wing Thatcherism, Blur were one of the biggest bands that sounded like hope before New Labour sold everyone out.

The late '90s let-down that followed, Jon Savage, author of "England's Dreaming," has said — where the country watched the heroes become the enemies — somehow felt worse than all the long years on the sidelines. It didn't take long before the government disappointed everyone, the pop scene that Parklife stood for fractured, Britain was a dirty word again, and the world got stuck with fucking Coldplay.

No one, especially after America's latest clean start, wants history to repeat like that.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
there was also this little thing called 'rave' that was pretty awesome, too
Posted by Brandon on November 13, 2008 at 5:53 PM
2
"...dull and masculine working class chic..."?????????

WoW! Tha's what you thought of Grunge? Ever listen to a little something called Heavy Metal?

I'm starting to get the feeling that the Stranger is ashamed of it's ties to the Seattle music scene of the early 90's.

Plus, isn't it funny how Blur started to sound like certain American musics after "Parklife?"
Posted by Keekee on November 13, 2008 at 9:04 PM
3
Point of order, though: Tony Blair only ascended to power in 1997, and contrary to *some* revisionist histories it took more than five minutes for the public to become disaffected with New Labour. All the classic, Britpop-era Blur albums are the product of growing up in the mean, hateful, right-wing Britain of Thatcher and her children. Which is exactly why I was mystified by Eric Brady's previous post about Parklife being born of an era of prosperity and fun. Er, no.

P.S. rave was the sound of people in so much despair that they had to blot out the sound of the world with music and anything else with the most powerful drugs they could lay their hands on :P
Posted by Matthew Marcus on November 13, 2008 at 9:19 PM
4
Blur started to sound like certain American musics

hey look! the Stranger is advertising for S. Malkmus and the Jicks! SM is tres cool, wild to see he namedropped John Ashberry's "A Wave" in some 90s interview. I did a some 5page criteek/analisis of that book during undergrad. We be on saym wavelengthhhhh.....th...tj;rg,,l;

"Let the products sell themselves / Fuck advertising..."
Minutemen's d.boon let 'er R.I.P.
Posted by gry mklsk on November 13, 2008 at 9:20 PM
5
"...grunge-unfriendly gender experimentation."

Huh--Yous really never experienced Seattle in the early 90's didja?
Posted by Keekee on November 13, 2008 at 10:49 PM
6
Exactly.
Grandy's original post was the most embarrassing literal mindedness and lack of recent historical knowledge. He either didn't listen to the lyrics or has the ironic sense of Alanis Morissette and shouldn't listen to any British pop music.

Or at least not: The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Kinks, The Who, Roxy Music, David Bowie, T-Rex, Queen, The Sex Pistols, The Clash, The Jam, The Buzzcocks, The Smiths, The Happy Mondays, Oasis, Pulp, Supergrass, The Libertines, The Streets, Amy Winehouse, Lily Allen in addition to Blur and Albarn's post Blur projects(listed off the top of my head).
Posted by its like rain on your wedding day on November 14, 2008 at 10:34 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use