Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Listless

Posted by Dean Fawkes on Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Goodbye, 2008.

Lists! Lists are everywhere!

And you thought you were done with them.

But lists are a bad habit. They appeal to the worst in us. In music fans, who look for ways to validate their tastes, either by feeling good or angry about published picks. And in music writers, The Stranger's not included, who feed off, for the most part, ugly instincts for dishonest, one-of-each-genre variety and an attempt to find quick credibility with their readers and peers.

Lists have also become ineffective for the way they seem to increasingly need someone to apologize for the entries' faults, with writers often explicitly trying to brush away the problems like they didn't matter. If "Best Albums" lists, for example, were accurate, they'd be called "Most Interesting Albums" — which isn't a bad thing — and a look back at previous years' choices generally leave you with a sense of embarrassment or of being cheated.

Part of this clearly comes from the itch to look at the history of music through a series of albums, or the invention of the CD itself, when the album idea lost its A/B-side dynamic and musicians began to indulge themselves with 74-minute quantity-over-quality, and mp3s made it even worse. But that's a blah-blah-blah story.

This, then, is what we remember of 2008.

Which might look like a list.

Wahey!

Pop : Out-Of-Breath
After last year's onslaught of pop music, nothing in the last twelve months was as good as Kylie's X — potentially the album of her career — or Siobhán Donaghy's lush and left-field and beautifully astonishing Ghosts. While there was a classic girl-pop album between 2008's efforts by Sugababes, Girls Aloud, Britney Spears, and The Saturdays, none of them could gel quite enough to give a thrill.

And where's the Robyn follow-up?



Dubstep : Flatlines
Bigger than ever, dubstep lost its touch with the sour-faces of Distance, Silkie, Martyn, and Likhan. But it also went hardcore (Caspa's "Where's My Money" remix), ridiculous (Joker's "Snake Eater"), and universal (Benga & Coki's "Night"). The bass of RSD's "Over It" knocked molecules out of the air, while Chase & Status's "Eastern Jam" brought life back to the idea of incorporating sounds of the developing world. There was The Bug's London Zoo as well, an excellent and brutish, full-length descent into unexpected ragga-fried dubstep. At a Skream set in London, and later in Seattle, we leapt around like a monkey with mobs of people as a load of worries for the genre melted away, grateful that the man from Croydon remains the scene's leading light.



Indie : Going A Bit Bald
Indie music continues its 21st century descent into bullshit cool and self-parody.

Don't think of The Ting Tings' "That's Not My Name" and the way its many-songs-in-one exponentially improves with each second, layering itself into a manic ultra-climax. Don't think of Mystery Jets' "Two Doors Down" for being the least obnoxious and most addictive track '80s kitsch has given us to date. Also don't think of Kaiser Chiefs' "Like It Too Much" for being a glowing anthem of chemicals and British pop, Crystal Castles' "Alice Practice" for its traumatic use in a heartbreaking scene in the television series "Skins", Primal Scream for inventing sunshine Krautrock, and Hadouken! for recovering the dialogue between white guitar music and black dance-culture.



Think, however, of earnest, over-orchestrated, vaguely melodic indie music that continues to dominate the genre — Coldplay, The Editors, Arcade Fire, and everyone they've inspired, from M83 to The Helio Sequence — which wants to be epic and important, but ends up sounding like afternoon specials with Bryan Adams running in an allergy-medication field of the human spirit.

Green Gartside of Scritti Politti writes:

What I hear in is an agglomeration of mannerisms, clichés, and devices. It's monotonous in its textures and in the old-fashioned, nasty, clunky '80s rhythms and eighth-note basslines. It isn't, as people are suggesting, richly rewarding and inventive. The melodies stick too closely to the chord changes. [The] voice uses certain stylistic devices — it goes wobbly and shouty, then whispery — and I guess people like wobbly and shouty going to whispery, they think it signifies real feeling. It's rather flat and unlovely.

Indie music has been in creative panic for a while, a mid-life crisis, and engaging in generic post-punk revivals (U.K.) and add-instruments-until-someone-notices (U.S.) will unfortunately never be anything but a red sports-car.

Sophisticated, Feminine Electro-Pop : Back
You could have had a good time arguing with friends about the individual approaches of Annie, Ladyhawke, and Parralox — all coming off like modern, somewhat fresh riffs on Blondie and the Pet Shop Boys — and it'll be interesting to see where the next year takes us, with the likes of Little Boots and Lily Allen going for the same gold.



Shit '80s Keyboards : Fashionable
Now more than ever, welcome in everything from cheap 8-bit local bands (Truckasauras) to celebrity mallternative (Metro Station). But usually end up as D.O.A. attempts for irony or innovation.



Grime : Lost Its Mind
Dizzee Rascal and Wiley broke into the electro-grime club with their first massive, runaway, mainstream hit singles, and JME reasserted the scene's original significance with Famous? ("123", "Boogiedown Bass"), while bassline — the latest in the acid house, jungle, 2-step, dubstep continuum — grew in the corner with Dexplicit and A1 Bassline, watching, waiting, for its time in the British, working-class, future-paving dance-culture spotlight.



James
Back after seven years. A Top 10 celebratory comeback.

A burst of white-light and Mancunian guitars — and dedicated to Tony Wilson.

Hey Ma is more fascinating and beautiful than it has any right to be.

We sang "boys in body bags" in our bedroom and in front of them in England, a line from the new album's title-track, one of the band's best achievements and one of the only euphoric protest songs ever written.

Uncool. Unfashionable.

Impossibly good.


This is, whatever it eventually means, the 2008 that springs to mind.

Not horrible, not spectacular, but a year of sounds in transition.

A year of mixed-messages.

Things can only get better?

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Absolutely perfect. Very right about KM's X and the sad state of indie rock (whatever def we are using). In a lot of ways, the blame rests on teh internets. Shitty bands are as old as rock and roll, but only now can a band that has never played a show get widespread exposure. Let me go one step further: There has never been, nor will there ever be, a great band that has become popular before paying any sort of "dues". That can mean playing small venues or writing and releasing albums worth of materials. But I defy anyone to name a great band that was overhyped and actually paid off in the end.
Posted by pestilence on January 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM
2
So glad you mentioned Kylie's album as well - I don't think a lot of reviewers did? But I might be biased because I also think she would make a better doctor in Doctor Who. Love your middle age comparison with indie music -very funny, sad and true. But I look forward to your 2009 reviews - woo! (Kylie for Doctor Who!)
Posted by Triple X on January 7, 2009 at 6:47 PM
3
you know, when I saw Crystal Castles in Skins I thought we were headed for a Bait Shop moment to close off what could have been a Very Special episode, but the band faded into the background of a devastating and perfect ending.
Posted by josh on January 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM
4
I don't know, I think you're still making listening to music too much of a dichotomy, setting up a situation where either one listens to Kylie or the Arcade Fire but never both. It's still too much of an us v. them situation, except you're being contrary to your peers. It is possible to find a place for multiple, even conflicting, genres, and judge each on their own merits rather than setting them up as an opposition to fight against.
Posted by Abby on January 7, 2009 at 10:44 PM
5
@4: Except that both Kylie and Arcade Fire suck. So I guess there's that. More of a me vs. them than an us vs. them.
Posted by A on January 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM
6
@4
I don't think it's a dichotomy at all he's getting at. I think he's saying Pop music right now is infinitely more interesting than the underground music that is the current state of indie rock. I completely agree. Indie music lost the thread somewhere (late 90's early 2000's??) and really has become warmed over retro or parody.
@5
Ummm, no. Kylie is fucking brilliant.
Posted by cooker on January 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM
7
@6: but that's still a dichotomy- because pop is interesting, then something else (indie) has to not be interesting. Some is, of course, going to be crap, but one can say the same for pop. I don't think the Arcade Fire (or M83) is uninteresting at all- the Arcade Fire does great pop songs, in a different way than Kylie, and I'm not sure how one comes up with the idea that their style is warmed-over self-parody unless you're deliberately trying to set up a contrast. I like both. But it does seem like if you want to like one side, you have to dislike the other, and I think that's a wrong mentality.
Posted by Abby on January 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM
8
@7
It sounds like you just aren't a very discerning listener. I don't having "taste" qualifies as setting up a dichotomy. Some genres of music are flourishing artistically right now, and Indie music (in general) is so stagnant it's sad. This is coming from someone who loves a lot of different kinds of music, cool and otherwise. But I would honestly say I thought Celine Dion's single from this year was more interesting than anything from The Hold Steady, for example. It pains me to say that, but the Indie trend has become just as generic and snoozy, just with less capable vocalists.
Posted by cooker on January 8, 2009 at 3:21 PM
9
@8: it sounds like you're just being contrary for the hell of it. Reverse cool, perhaps. I don't find the Hold Steady interesting either, but I'm not sure how the example of one band with one sound tars the entire, extremely broad (and meaningless) umbrella category of "indie" meaningless. And considering "indie" a genre is rather ridiculous, isn't it?
Posted by Abby on January 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM
10
I tried to engage with Pitchfork's list this year, and found it challenging, until I realised that it wasn't "the music that everyone should be listening to", but an overview of the sort of music that anyone might want to consider listening to. After a few listens I *admired* every album of their top 10 or 15 or whatever, but I'd probably chew off my own leg sooner than I'd listen to Cut Copy, or Fleet Foxes, or Erykah Badu, or what to my untutored ears are the highly polished disco turds of Hercules & Love Affair, oversung by Antony Hegarty, whose voice I consider to be possibly the most punchable of the modern age.

H&LA fans may be shaking their heads in disbelief at my idiotic lack of taste - but that's the point. I don't "get" their band - but I appreciate that it deserves to be on the list, as the current apotheosis of a genre, whether or not that genre has ever done anything for me personally. From the list I discovered that I did enjoy Deerhunter, M83, and a bunch of artists swimming around in the middle reaches of Pitchfork's fifty. But my selection of the cream will never be the same as yours, and nor should it.

Once I'd finished playing around on the Pitchfork site, I remembered the bands that didn't make it anywhere near their list, but which are much better ambassadors for 2008 in my, subjective, book: Blitzen Trapper, Okkervil River, Islands, The Raveonettes, The Indelicates, and the list goes on. You sneak the James comeback album in there at the end because it means a lot to *you*, and that's fantastic. Everyone who blindly assumed the album of the year was a choice between Fleet Foxes or TV and the Radio because that's what the critics told them it was should check their autonomy to make sure it's still working. I'm more inclined to respect an album of the year that is a personalised, not a critically-endorsed, choice.
More...
Posted by Matthew on January 8, 2009 at 8:24 PM
11
Dean's done a great list here for The Stranger with some ups and downs for 2008, and a couple predictions for 2009. James and Primal Scream made the list, which is a good thing, but I love the caveat about indie and the direction it's heading. Basically, crap. I do like me some Coldplay, but it's sappy, boring music compared to the edgier, more independently-spirited music that's coming out of other indies in the UK and elsewhere.
Posted by Pete on January 11, 2009 at 8:25 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use