Friday, October 23, 2009

Tonight In this City

Posted by Grant Brissey on Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM

If you're out in the city tonight and the music stops at precisely 11:30 pm, it's because the bar you're at is participating in "The Night the Music Died." Here's the press release:

THE NIGHT THE MUSIC DIED: SEATTLE NIGHTLIFE TO OBSERVE A "MINUTE OF SILENCE" IN FEAR OF TOM CARR'S RE-ELECTION

Seattle nightlife establishments from throughout the City are scared of what will happen if Tom Carr is re-elected on November 3. How scared? In an effort to raise awareness of City Attorney Tom Carr's anti-nightlife policies — and to emphasize the importance of a safe and vibrant nightlife — bar, live music venue and nightclub owners will observe a "minute of silence" on Friday, October 23, 2009, at 11:30 PM.

For one minute, nightlife as we know it will cease to exist in Seattle. Participating establishments will use a portion of this minute to inform their patrons of Carr's anti-nightlife policies and the importance of electing his opponent Pete Holmes. Carr, a longstanding opponent of the nightlife industry and the mastermind behind Operation Sobering Thought — a botched "sting" operation that cost the taxpayers over $50,000 and resulted in zero convictions — has continued his efforts to hamper nightlife and the arts as the election approaches.

Many in the nightlife community believe it is the ultimate goal of Carr's office to shut down bars and nightclubs in the City of Seattle, thereby decimating an industry that employs thousands of people and generates nearly $100 million in annual tax revenue.

The Stranger and the Seattle Times over the past week have been giving extensive coverage to the issue of nightlife. The bar, venue and club owners have been particularly fearful in the wake of blistering attacks from Carr's office that occurred at a meeting on October 6 on Capitol Hill. At that meeting, a member of Carr's office threatened to stop pedestrians on the street to find out where they were drinking and then use the information collected to issue citations and possibly revoke the licenses of those nightlife establishments.

"A vote for Carr is a vote against nightlife," said Crocodile Café owner Marcus Charles. "If you want someone who is pro-consensus, pro-music, and pro-arts then Pete Holmes is the only choice." Charles has decided to join the event and to take it one step further: The Crocodile will close down for the entirety of Friday night.

Participating in the Minute of Silence will be the Crocodile Café, Neumos, Moe Bar, Havana, The Saint, Trinity, The Sunset Tavern, Tractor Tavern, Cha Cha Lounge, Bimbos, Baltic Room, Rendezvous, Del Rey, Shorty's, Spitfire Grill, Venom, Amber, Funhouse, Nectar, High Dive, The Red Door, ToST, Skylark Café and Club, Trinity, Cowgirls inc., Tractor Tavern, Sunset Tavern, Lock and Keel Inn, War Room, Century Ballroom, R Place, Seattle Eagle, Quinns Pub, and many others.

"Music and nightlife makes a city great, plain and simple," said Havana owner Quentin Ertel. "Nobody wants to live in a ghost town."

As a show of support, the marquee at Showbox Market will be dark all night.

Read more about Carr vs. Bars here.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Neumo's? Does this mean The Jesus Lizard is going to stop mid-set? Wow.
Posted by Levislade http://www.myspace.com/levifuller on October 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM
2
What a bunch of over-dramatic, paranoid pussies. Grow some testicles.
Posted by Just as bad as the right-wingers gun nutjobs on October 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM
3
@2, your glib comment comes from a place of having zero information. The zest, intent, vitriol and time Carr and his staff have spent attacking Seattle nightlife can not be underemphasized. The guy is truly Evil and needs to be voted out.
Posted by Bah humbug on October 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
cosby 4
Does anyone actually think that the goal of the city of Seattle is to shut down bars and nightclubs? I understand why people are angry, but that is a real Michigan Militia type statement. Anyone who legitimately thinks this is the case can go live in the woods and wait out the apocalypse, leaving the thinking (and voting) to the non-crazies.
Posted by cosby http://www.myspace.com/cosbyshownights on October 23, 2009 at 10:50 AM
5
@3 How many bars have been closed? How many liquor licenses have been revoked? What is the total net monetary loss that local businesses have paid because of this "evil"? The answers, respectively are: zero, zero, and zero. You can be opposed to Carr all you want, but this is still a nation of laws, and it is inaccurate and wholly misrepresentative to create some kind of boogey man that simply doesn't exist. My "glib" comments come from a place of rational and informed reality, whereas yours come from the perspective of a sheep who is merely falling for the scare tactics. Think for yourself. Educate yourself about how the legal process works. Because despite what people like Holden say (a high-school dropout who somehow claims to be an expert in all things legal), Carr or any city attorney does not have a license to run around town unchecked. The burden regarding any impropriety is ALWAYS on the state. That's how the process works. And trust me, Dom Holden wouldn't know the first thing about the legal process because he is solely concerned with riling people up by speaking in platitudes. The paranoia and irrationality of Stranger "writers" is simply astounding. Failing Logic is an obvious pre-requisite for working for the master-logician-failure: Dan Savage.
Posted by Facts are stubborn things on October 23, 2009 at 10:51 AM
very bad homo 6
Nobody silences Beth Ditto!
Posted by very bad homo on October 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM
dan10things 7
@4 - I think you're taking a few words used as dramatic flair in a press release to miss the gist of the argument. Tom Carr has definitely harassed and made business more difficult for both music clubs and gay bars while in office, he's done so with an unexplained zeal for over-enforcement on these specific types of establishment. I don't think he wants to shut them all down, but I think he wants to quiet them down, make them less numerous and stifle their ability to make clubs a place where we can go to have a fun, rowdy night with our friends. It's sorta the same way straight Christians want to have say over what goes on in the bedrooms or relationships of gay men, they just don't like what's going on and will use whatever political weapons they have to try to control other people's behavior. Carr's approach hurts businesses, stifles creativity, and attempts to take away our fun. We just don't need big government breathing down our necks like that, they are our employees and should be spending our tax dollars in tackling real crime issues instead of messing with music fans, bands and clubs. This protest is just an attempt to get more press and awareness about Carr's tactics and behavior as to get everyone that enjoys or cares about the local music community to vote for his opponent in the upcoming election.
Posted by dan10things http://10thingszine.blogspot.com on October 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM
8
#5

I think you have Tom Carr posting here .... sure sounds like him. Read it for a mini intro .. now you know why you should support Mr. Holmes.

Good idea, get some unity.

Carr has been part of many attempts to fuck with gay bars and cops walking thru making inspections and taunting customers and bartenders. One Hispanic bartender, 3rd generation American, was asked for his "papers."

Shit.

DO NOT VOTE FOR TOM CARR.

Signed: Jesus Gomez
Posted by J. Gomez on October 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Jason Josephes 9
Didn't a bunch of bars try and do this a few years ago with hilarious results?
Posted by Jason Josephes http://www.myspace.com/bluemoonseattle on October 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM
10
@8 Funny how you can't refute any of the points made. Not really funny. More like it is so sad that your mother failed so hard. Let me guess, you're a high-school dropout paranoid pothead "musician", right? Down with the m-a-a-a-n, man!
Posted by You gotta mother fucking served, Gomez on October 23, 2009 at 11:16 AM
11
@4, I stand corrected, you're coming from a place of dis-information (it's telling that you refer to Dominic with an insidery "Dom"). While I don't disagree that Savage, Holden, the Stranger & co can be reactionary chicken-littles, this is simply not the case when it comes to Tom Carr and the activist anti-nightlife missions of his office (the Stranger have always done a disservice to themselves and their credibility with their now-I-hate-Obama and goat-sucking crap, obviously you're taking that into consideration with this issue).

Carr in office with a weak incoming Mayor (which is, no matter who's elected, what they'll be) would mean effectively unapposed anti-nightlife agendas from the City Attorney's office. "Dom's" recent article not only hits the nail on the head, it's only the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by Bah humbug on October 23, 2009 at 11:16 AM
dan10things 12
""What is the total net monetary loss that local businesses have paid because of this "evil"? ... zero"

Please let us know the statistics you used to reach this zero hypothesis, because I find it's nearly impossible to come up with a monetary value unrealized gains. Consider, perhaps, that your unproven assumption has no basis in fact and might indeed be wrong. But more importantly, I'm not sure why this matters to music fans. We have the choice to vote for candidate A or B, and A turns out to be quite a jerk towards the music and communities, so those communities are asking you to vote for his opponent. That's not paranoia or irrational.
Posted by dan10things http://10thingszine.blogspot.com on October 23, 2009 at 11:17 AM
13
@11 But where are the tangible "evils" you speak of? There are none! That's why the argument fails. Carr's been in this position for years and the sky has not fallen. Check your facts. And don't ever make conclusions without substantial premises. Seriously, Logic 101 dude.
Posted by Are you really this stupid? Really? on October 23, 2009 at 11:18 AM
14
@12 "Unrealized Gains? What the fuck does that even mean? Does it mean that because you have bought into scare-tactics that have no factual, tangible basis, that no one can argue against you? It's so hard explaining things to those without the cognitive ability to understand logic. Go back to "band practice", dude, and leave the actual work for those of us with intellectual ability leaps and bounds above the paranoid potheads.
Posted by It's like watching a retard try to read. on October 23, 2009 at 11:22 AM
15
@11 Not "evils", HE is Evil. That's the only way I'd describe his nature. The smiling, nice-guy, friend of all communities facade he's worn during the election season may have fooled you, but it doesn't cover his actions. You're right, the sky has not fallen in with Carr in office, thanks only to awareness and counter activism against his crusades.
Posted by Bah humbug on October 23, 2009 at 11:32 AM
16
The city attorneys lied about crime stats in order to "crack down" on Cap Hill Clubs. I know because I was there. When the Stranger and Seattle times fact checked Milner/ Carr. It turned out they LIED. Ginned up stats in order for their own political agenda. LIARS shouldn't hold office! I'm sick of my club being harassed!
Posted by Erok on October 23, 2009 at 11:38 AM
17
Wow, you pro Carr people are scary. Lets see YOUR facts.

You can put other people down really well, but what are the facts to defend YOUR case. Why is it that the entire music community is wary of Carr?

Show us how Carr is pro nightlife and pro music.
Posted by Samanthal on October 23, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Scalpel 18
I suspect that if Carr has his way, not ALL bars will be shut down. He's probably fine with everyone going to down to TGIFriday's for an Appletini, or rocking out at your neighborhood Red Robin.

What's that? You go to a night club? No no no, those will definitely go away. Night clubs are frequented by sexual deviants, loose women, and the Negro. Tom Carr will abolish these dens of opium smoking and jazz music; making the city safe again for children, land-owning males, and white women.
Posted by Scalpel on October 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Enigma 19
@18 Well, Carr had an alcoholic father, so this is all totally justified. Right?
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on October 23, 2009 at 12:34 PM
dan10things 20
@14 Unrealized gains = monetary loss. You said these businesses have experienced zero monetary loss because of Carr's policies. I don't understand how you think you can account for that loss.

It's great you think you're smart, instead of how I see you, as someone namecalling, overly-dramatic, and failing to put a logical argument together. It boils down to who do you think is worse for the music community, Carr or Holmes. Nightclub owners and The Stranger have put forth their argument for voting for Holmes, why not instead of whining about why they don't like Carr, you tell us why we should vote for him?
Posted by dan10things http://10thingszine.blogspot.com on October 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Scalpel 21
@19: Clearly. I mean, he's basically Batman, except instead of criminals killing his parents, booze killed his childhood. Also, instead of inspiring terror in the hearts of the criminal underworld, he inspires terror in the hearts of people whose bed time is after 9:00 PM.

But the molded rubber nipples? Those are the same.
Posted by Scalpel on October 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM
22
HERE ARE SOME FACTS PEOPLE.........WE LOST APROX 60K in revenue May 2008 when the city attorneys office decided to change, reinterpret, re-inspect Fire, Noise, and capacity in our business.

The final outcome??? We are running the exact same business we were before the crack down. There were no citations, and they found nothing wrong with our operation in the end, but their attack on our business daily, cost us 60k over a 6 - 8 week period.

Capital Hill Business.
Posted by swakinc on October 23, 2009 at 1:52 PM
23
Ohh Hey 17. The Facts ARE COMING. By next Thursday you will understand since you don't already that this is a real issue.
Posted by swakinc on October 23, 2009 at 1:54 PM
24
carr has got to go. he attacks good, legitimate businesses that honestly care about a healthy and safe nightlife. he hurts good people trying to a good job. it's unfortunate more people don't know how this guy operates.
his approach is unfair, unbalanced and 100% unsupportive of nightlife establishments. he sees seattle nightlife as a hindrance instead of the vital asset that it is to seattle culture.
good, honest business people fall under carrs personal agenda. like i said, his approach is aggressive and threatening. he hurts good businesses and their efforts at producing a safe, vibrant nightlife. in turn, he's negatively affecting that very notion by stifling the responsible business owners. go away tom carr. you suck and make good business owners question whether or not they want to be in the nightlife business any longer. the businesses go away... so will our killer, world renowned nightlife. go pete holmes!!!!
mahalo
Posted by lilster on October 23, 2009 at 3:44 PM
25
My household turned in 2 of 2 votes for Holmes.

What pisses me off most about Carr is that he talks about Operation Sobering Thought as a success. ZERO convictions. It was 100% intimidation... and it fell flat! On top of his disingenuous arguments for his record, he has an anger problem. Go fuck yourself, Tom.



Posted by Aspiring lawyer. on October 24, 2009 at 6:49 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use