Monday, October 26, 2009

Das...Surprisingly Intelligent

Posted by Eric Grandy on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Who would've thought that these guys:


...would've read this Sasha Frere-Jones piece in the New Yorker about how hiphop is dead vis-a-vis Jay-Z:

Weighing in early on what academics call “periodization” is a dicey proposition. If you try to locate the moment of a major paradigm shift, in the moment, perhaps by calling your album “Hip Hop Is Dead,” as Nas did in 2006, you’re slipping into weatherman territory. Will it rain tomorrow? Will another great rap album pop up? The life spans of genres and art forms are best perceived from the distance of ten or twenty years, if not more. With that in mind, I still suspect that Nas—along with a thousand bloggers—was not fretting needlessly.

If I had to pick a year for hip-hop’s demise, though, I would choose 2009, not 2006. Jay-Z’s new album, “The Blueprint 3,” and some self-released mixtapes by Freddie Gibbs are demonstrating, in almost opposite ways, that hip-hop is no longer the avant-garde, or even the timekeeper, for pop music.

...and fired back at it with this:

Sasha Frere-Jones opens his article by admitting that “weighing in early on what academics call ‘periodization’ is a dicey proposition,” as a nominal caveat before launching into doing just that. This is a rhetorical approach that he’s used before (namely in “Whiter Shade of Pale”) and is basically just another flavor of the age old “Now, I don’t mean to be racist but [insert something racist here]” Kool-Aid.

SFJ is savvy enough to know that before pulling a “white man speaks authoritatively on black culture” move, he needs to first establish an acceptable precedent for his argument by locating it in the ideology of a credible black artist (in this case Nas’s 2006 album Hip Hop is Dead). But notice how SFJ then immediately undermines that credibility: while he could just say “Nas called it three years ago,” he instead claims that while Nas’s sentiment was correct, the proclamation was three years premature, as if to say “Nice try, Nas, but leave it to the professional (white, college-educated) music journalist to make sweeping statements about (black, ghetto-originated) music.”

Oh, Das Racist, you so crazy educated at Wesleyan!

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (2) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
cosby 1
Frere-Jones fucks up a lot (A LOT) when writing about urban culture in the New Yorker, yet I look forward to reading what he has to write keeping in mind that everything he is seeing is through the windows of a Manhattan (or Williamsburg?) ivory tower. That being said, his recent article was off the mark and was really reaching to prove its conclusion. Hip-hop is dead because it's adapting or because it has started to integrate house rhythms? Did he miss the hip-house movement in the early 90s with shitty rhyming and euro-rhythms that gave way to NYC's return to darker street rap in the mid 90s?. Quoting a Nas album title was the least of the article's problems.
Posted by cosby http://www.myspace.com/cosbyshownights on October 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM
2
This is a nice opportunity to remember how much i hated that piece last year, and how much i loved Carl Wilson's rejoinder.
Posted by Kevin Erickson on October 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use