Line Out Music & the City at Night

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

A Great Book About Zaireeka

Posted by on Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM

Screen_shot_2010-03-02_at_12.18.52_PM.png
Last night, I read Zaireeka, Mark Richarson's 33 1/3 book about the making of the Flaming Lips' 1997 four-CD album. I read it in one sitting; it's a pretty amazing book. Richardson is the managing editor of Pitchfork, but he mercifully keeps the book free of Pitchfork-isms. This is a wildly accessible, entertaining, and thoughtful book about the importance of an album that nobody talks about much anymore.

One of the things that Richardson is so good at here is context. He establishes the fact that Zaireeka arrived at a perfect moment: just as music was about to leap into the age of the iPod, Zaireeka required four CD players to play it properly. And it established a midpoint break in the Flaming Lips' career, transforming the public perception of the band from a minor alternative rock act to an art-rock band with pop tendencies. Richardson takes a long view of Zaireeka, focusing on the origins of the Flaming Lips, what led to the creation of the album, and what the album has meant for their career.

Richardson is clearly a fan of the band (although he notes in the beginning of the book that this is a rare entry in the 33 1/3 series, because he hasn't listened to Zaireeka endlessly; he's only heard it the way the Flaming Lips intended "a handful of times"), and by viewing them through their most ambitious project, he makes the reader a little more of a fan, too. There are a few annoying problems with the book—most notably, Richardson tends to repeat details a lot, giving a few passages a twice-told-tale flavor—but all in all, it's a damn fine essay. Zaireeka is probably my second favorite 33 1/3 title to date (following Carl Wilson's extraordinary Let's Talk About Love, which is virtually unbeatable.) I'd recommend it for music-lovers, for musicians who have spent time in the recording studio, for people who are even vaguely interested in the Flaming Lips.

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I was curious as to how Richardson would dissect the album (though not really an album, more like a work). It would appear that he tackles it as a whole and doesn't break it down piece by piece? Does he focus on the instrumentation and arrangements or is most of the focus placed on the importance of the work and the context?
Posted by Omar on March 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM
Estey 2
He does both, Omar.

My ridiculous excuse for not writing a review of this myself is that I've been carrying it around town and rereading it for weeks to savor it. Last one I did that with was the Wilson book, too.

(It is unfortunate about the amount of typos, though.)
Posted by Estey on March 2, 2010 at 3:50 PM
3
I'll have to check this out. Agree about Wilson's book too. I'm biased, because Carl is a friend of mine, but his book is really the gold standard as far the 33 1/3 books are concerned.
Posted by j-lon on March 2, 2010 at 11:16 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy