Line Out Music & the City at Night

Sunday, August 29, 2010

So Vampire Weekend Just Cancelled

Posted by on Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Like an hour or more after Beach House finished their set some poor guy came onstage, thanked everyone profusely, and explained that Vampire Weekend were cancelling the show due to illness. People are pissed. Over and out.

Update: Oh yeah, there'll be refunds and/or a rescheduled date to come.

 

Comments (46) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Finally got sick from their own music? Ha.
Posted by 1234567M on August 29, 2010 at 9:13 PM
2
Interesting...I know they did an EndSession for 1077 earlier at the Gibson Showroom in Seattle - I wonder if there were any indications then?
Posted by coren on August 29, 2010 at 9:16 PM
3
Seattle needs to stop serving bad sushi. Or dumb ass musicians need to stop getting so drunk.
Posted by Jerry Dikfor on August 29, 2010 at 9:26 PM
4
my kids last night of summer just got hosed. thx VW... not.
Posted by irritated parent on August 29, 2010 at 9:56 PM
5
for 80 minutes, i was trapped next to frat boys and soccer moms in the audience. if VW reschedules, i'm bringing eggs.
Posted by team jacob on August 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM
6
Well, seeing as how they have no dates open until December, we're in for a show at the Key or someplace equally shitty.
Posted by vampired out on August 29, 2010 at 10:11 PM
7
The VW keyboarded was talking to a photog right behind us during the Beach House set and nothing seemed amiss. He was complaining about the stage. Something seems fishy about the cancellation.
Posted by npeyton on August 29, 2010 at 10:37 PM
stinkbug 8
It sounds like there were a million crying kids there tonight:

"We took our 13 year old, his buddy (first concert ever), our 9 and 6 year old. Vampire weekend is our family's favorite band. Our daughter was crying by the end of the night with dissappointment."

"Hard to explain to the five year old why she waited and didn't get to hear her very favorite band!"

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=14…
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=14…
Posted by stinkbug on August 30, 2010 at 12:49 AM
9
It sucked. I think that there was no illness.
http://www.nme.com/news/vampire-weekend/…
happened in 2008....
Fishy.
Posted by ratt200 on August 30, 2010 at 1:28 AM
giffy 10
@8 I love the intensity of emotion people can have over minor disappointment. Kids need to learn perspective and no time like the present!
Posted by giffy on August 30, 2010 at 7:08 AM
michaelp 11
I reminded of a time when I went to see Tricky at DV8 a long time ago. There were apparent bus problems, and day of, people at the door, the show was canceled.

Not too long after (or maybe a year after?), Tricky (with Whale opening) showed up, only to walk off stage about 40 minutes into the set, complaining of the shitty sound system (he had been jumping mics the entire set), and didn't come back out.

This was, of course, after Tricky showed up a good hour or so late for his set at Lollapalooza (the year Tool headlined). Total prima donna. But fucking amazing live, and I totally would see him again.

All I know is that I was offered up a chance to go last night, and I'm glad parental duties made that impossible. Nothing worse than finding out, especially after opening act(s), that a show is off.
Posted by michaelp on August 30, 2010 at 8:50 AM
12
why is everyone acting like this was some huge conspiracy where vampire weekend set out to specifically ruin your kids' last day of summer vacation? lead singer was legitimately sick. they were already planning on playing a special set to accommodate his illness and lack of vocal range.
Posted by so yawn on August 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM
josh 13
Their tour schedule looks absolutely murderous. Finding recovery tine, let alonr a replacement date, has to be a huge challenge.
Posted by josh http://www.sciencevsromance.net on August 30, 2010 at 9:13 AM
14
i think it was just irresponsibility on the bands part. rumor has that they did an End Session earlier that day just fine. the fact that the whole crowd waited for 90+ minutes before announcing the "illness in the band" is shitty.

i've had tickets to other shows where there have been illnesses, and they announced a reschedule before the show even started...

Beach House nailed it, BTW. it was great to see them perform live.
Posted by cjr on August 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM
15
i don't care about a make up date, i just want my money back. feed vampire weekend to the juggalos for all i care, cardigans and all.
Posted by over it on August 30, 2010 at 9:37 AM
biffp 16
They were great in Vancouver on Saturday night. I don't know how the band drank, but the audience was toasted.
Posted by biffp on August 30, 2010 at 9:42 AM
biffp 17
Dum Dum Girls were good, Beach House blew.
Posted by biffp on August 30, 2010 at 9:49 AM
18
About 2 minutes before the announcement, my wife looked over into the parking lot and asked "is that an ambulance leaving?"

I wonder if the reason they waited so long to tell anyone was so they could get medical attention without having to navigate the sea of angry fans.
Posted by skiplogic on August 30, 2010 at 9:58 AM
19
Waiting for the Kanye West "Vampire Weekend doesn't care about young people" moment.
Posted by Casual_Observer on August 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM
20
Thinking about it more: they did a performance earlier in the day. They had two opening bands. They had people wait like an hour and a half after the last band (typically it's half an hour or so at Marymoor). They had to know something was up by then, it doesn't take an hour after you should be on to figure out "oh, I'm sick, whoops".

Glad I didn't bother.
Posted by coren on August 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM
loganlorelai 21
This is turning into an inconsiderate mess on the part of Vampire Weekend and their handlers by not formally announcing anything to their fans on any of their sites, Twitter accounts, etc. To only say that they cancelled due to "illness" an hour and a half after Beach House's set after apparently making two earlier appearances in Seattle (after making the trip from their Vancouver stop the night before) isn't fair to the 4000+ in attendance. I'm sure their fans would've understood if they had more information regarding said "illness." But now we're left to speculation: did they really have a disagreement with their guarantee or rider? Food poisoning? Family emergency? What's the deal?

This is ridiculous - if VW seriously cared about their fans, they would've handled this differently, but it sure looks like they don't. They're in a very privileged position that can quickly change if they don't take care of those that made them popular in the first place. It bugs me when bands take their audience for granted, as VM appears to be doing.
Posted by loganlorelai on August 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM
22
See the band's explanation below:

Seattle Cancellation
Dear Seattle,

We are incredibly sorry about our last minute cancellation last night in Redmond - the decision wasn't taken lightly. Ezra had some vocal issues earlier in the day, but felt like he was improving however, while he was warming up just moments prior to our set time he lost his voice completely and was unable to perform. He was then taken to the ER and diagnosed with inflamed vocal cords and the doctor ordered him to not perform for 48 hours. Even so, we still wanted to perform but by that point it was clear that any performance we could give would have been essentially instrumental and nowhere close to what we or the audience was expecting.

We know you all had to wait around for the announcement, and many of you came a long way to be there, and again - we truly apologize.

Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea…
Posted by Aimdol on August 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM
23
I'm just glad it was a legitimate health issue. I suspected someone in the band was too drunk or high to play or they were being prima dona's and didn't like the venue. The condition Ezra's got is a real risk when one uses their voice as much as he does. It sucks this all happened. The announcement could have been made sooner and in a different manner but at least is wasn't due to VW's irresponsibility.
Posted by ac964 on August 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Out For Delivery 24
I'm still skeptical. Who knows what the real story is...

Where da refundz @?
Posted by Out For Delivery on August 30, 2010 at 12:29 PM
25
Saturday night at the Rendezvous Hurry Up Shotgun battled their way through this by having the backup guitar player (who isn't even a regular member of the band) take on most of the singing duties. It was the last day of their tour, they played to like 20 people and they made all of $50, i'm sure.

So how is it that they found a way to 'make it work' but the dudes getting paid thousands of dollars w/ hundreds of adoring fans waiting anxiously can't do the same? I'm sure the bass player knows the words, and I bet the crowd would be super understanding if when they came on they said something like "Dude A's voice is super fucked, and he had to go to the hospital. Doctor said he can't sing for a few days. So Dude B is going to sing the songs. We know that isn't exactly the same, but we wouldn't want to bail on all of you who came out to see us. We promise to come through again soon, when Dude A is better, and if you aren't cool w/ the switch, we totally understand and you can get a refund if you leave before the set (insert logistics for doing so)"

These people came to see a band. Not a solo act.
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on August 30, 2010 at 12:29 PM
josh 26
@25: "Dude A" isn't only the lead singer, he's also the lead guitar player.

It would've been cool if they tried to carry on, but it wouldn't have been anything like the show that people wanted to see.
Posted by josh http://www.sciencevsromance.net on August 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM
cosby 27
@25:
This is what any seasoned band would do.

Do something like bring out the opening band or bring fans on stage to sing along. It isn't like half of the band has food poisoning or a bus crash killed the guitarist - lead singer should be the easiest position to replace in the band and any lead singer who thinks otherwise is suffering from inflamed ego chords.
Posted by cosby http://www.myspace.com/cosbyshownights on August 30, 2010 at 12:56 PM
josh 28
I don't disagree that this was handled poorly, but it's just not credible to say that Ezra Koenig is the most easily replaceable member of Vampire Weekend.
Posted by josh http://www.sciencevsromance.net on August 30, 2010 at 1:00 PM
29
@25 - and that works when you have another member who can sing and you don't have thousands of people in attendance. I think they handled this poorly, but what you're suggesting isn't a reasonable solution either, IMO.

I'm curious why they didn't have someone show up say, when they took their singer to the ER, even if just to say there's been a problem.
Posted by coren on August 30, 2010 at 1:46 PM
30
The whole thing was handled very badly by people who clearly don't care about their fans. If his vocal cords were that screwed up, I can't imagine anyone with intelligence would think they would magically "heal" themselves in 30-60 minutes. Certainly making us sit in the chill for 90 minutes was unnecessary. I'm with all who said this is fishy and those who said a bit of an explanation would have gone a long way to keeping people calm. It's a shame. I was looking forard to hearing them live but I want a refund.
Posted by dcoy on August 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM
31
@26 and @29- I totally fail to see either of your points. I guarantee you that someone else in the band is totally capable of singing along, and if not, I'm sure a member of one of the openers could pull it off. Like I said, make the offer to refund anyone who is totally disappointed.

I understood that the singer had been told to lay off singing for a few days. If so, then he had already seen the doctor at the ER and would be available for guitar playing duties that evening. I have had inflamed vocal chords. It sucks, but there is nothing about it that prevents a person from standing (or sitting in a chair, i suppose) and strumming along to songs they have probably played 500 times. If he wasn't on hand, then there was no need for the wait.

I was unaware you had all gone to see 'Ezra Koenig and his Vampire Weekenders.'

I suppose it is more difficult to communicate a sense of entitlement without being able to speak.
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on August 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM
Thomas Guy 32
@31 I actually went to see and hear Ezra! I love his voice. Doesn't hurt that he's a cutie, either. Of course, Chris Thompson has got to be the happiest drummer alive.

http://www.mtv.com/videos/shows/vampire-…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmKnDFEjI…
Posted by Thomas Guy on August 30, 2010 at 2:29 PM
33
"I was unaware you had all gone to see 'Ezra Koenig and his Vampire Weekenders.'"

Sorry to say, but I think that's actually true for most of the audience.
Posted by vampired out on August 30, 2010 at 2:38 PM
biffp 34
It is for me. I love the guy's voice, and it wouldn't have been okay to pay $50 and hear the bass player sing with no lead guitar. It's a ridiculous suggestion, and you should just cede the point.

On the other hand, I agree with those who think there should be a refund, rather than a rain check. In light of the fact pattern, I don't see that happening though.
Posted by biffp on August 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM
sarahlloyd 35
seeing beach house for free sounds like an awesome time!
Posted by sarahlloyd on August 30, 2010 at 3:14 PM
Out For Delivery 36
@25/31 is right. They knew something was going on and should have started salvaging some sort of short 30-45 min something without Ezra the second he left for the ER. With a full refund after as well.

They just handled it with zero consideration for the 4000 people waiting around in the park.
Posted by Out For Delivery on August 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM
mbb 37
@35 is totally right! I only went to see Beach House anyway...and now I got to see them for FREE! Called ticketmaster today and got my refund! Thanks Vampire Weekend for cancelling!
Posted by mbb on August 30, 2010 at 4:04 PM
38
@32 and 34- Really? You care so little about what is going on w/ the rest of the 'music' that seeing the same people perform, with a different member singing, is unacceptable? Maybe even seeing them do some material that might not otherwise be trotted out yet, that would be ridiculous and not worth your time? I would think, if you were a big enough sucker for their schtick to shell out $50 for an outdoor show, you would be excited to see them pushing their boundaries a little bit. Or were you there to hear the hits? Cause you can buy the records and listen to the radio for that.

I've watched piss-ant little punk bands drag their asses through hell and back to not miss a show. I've seen a drummer w/ the flu play w/ a well utilized bucket next to their floor tom, and a singer who broke his arm 'out in the crowd' finish the set. They did so because they took what they do seriously. They felt that they had made an agreement to play, and failing to do so was a breech of ethics.

Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on August 31, 2010 at 9:23 AM
39
@38: We get it. You've seen some totally punk rock things happen. Congratulations on accumulating +15 scene points.

I don't think VW has ever tried to fall under that punk umbrella, and the fact of the matter is they aren't getting paid for not playing. I'm guessing most people would rather have gotten 2 great bands for free and then get their 50 bucks back instead of seeing 3 bands and having the headliner put on a totally subpar show.

I'm all for giving people their money's worth, and more than respect those sorts of bands with said bucket-puking/arm-breaking stories under their belts, but I'd much rather see a show that has a lot of heart and sounds good, too.
Posted by Casual_Observer on August 31, 2010 at 12:02 PM
40
@39 -I don't think it has much to do w/ punk or a scene, and obviously it has nothing to do w/ me.

I think your premise "has a lot of heart and sounds good too" is where my issue has been all along. Do you mean "sounds good" or do you mean "sounds like the record I have at home?" My argument isn't an economic one- of course they didn't get paid.

Let me put it like this: Would you rather:
A) see Velvet Underground at a place akin to the Showbox, with great sound, play every 'hit' in a very tight and familiar manner, or
B) see VU at some loft with an underpowered PA playing a shambled 26 minute version of Sister Ray, then Lou Reed leaves and the rest of the set is a Morrison noise raga?

I would pick B, because I am a fan of what bands 'Do', not what bands 'Have Done.'
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on August 31, 2010 at 1:48 PM
41
Chris, what YOU would rather see is not the compass by which sense is made -- some people are a fan of the MUSIC that bands make and don't give a shit about what they do or have done. One of the most common things that can make a band popular is the front man's and charisma. Without that singer, people will be fucking PISSED not to have that critical aspect of the show... Nobody wants to pay $50 to watch a Vampire Weekend tribute band. And that fact is not affected by how impressed you would be by their exquisite road seasoning.

I will at least go as far to say that if they had come out and played for a bit anyway, and still offered refunds, then that would have qualified as "cool of them".
Posted by RESAIL on August 31, 2010 at 2:26 PM
42
edit: the front man's *VOICE* and charisma
Posted by RESAIL on August 31, 2010 at 2:42 PM
43
I guess I should not expect a band that has literally had everything handed to them their entire lives to have any 'Road Seasoning'.

Why would you perform when you'd rather not? Why would you secure rights from the model you put on your album cover? It's just someone's work and someone's likeness. And so on.

They are terrible. Turns out, they are also probably terrible people.
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on September 1, 2010 at 11:07 AM
44
I just think your expectation that they do something to prove to the audience that they WOULD put on the show people payed to see is silly because it wouldn't solve the problem, which is that they can't. It seems this is more about your opinion of their backgrounds and presence than what actually happened at the show, which I guess is fine. I can totally get behind that last part, they really are terrible.
Posted by RESAIL on September 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM
45
Lots of bands/fine people come from privileged backgrounds. I think that has very little to do with their lack of wherewithal. What I object to is the casual-ness with which they treat their not very demanding occupation.

Other trust funders, like Thurston Moore and Jon Spencer take what they do seriously, despite the fact that they didn't have to, and work hard at it (regardless of how enthused you are w/ the outcome).
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on September 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM
46
what kind of pussy goes to the er for inflamed vocal cords?

oh, a pussy named ezra i guess
Posted by taint on September 1, 2010 at 7:24 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy