Line Out Music & the City at Night

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Slate (?!) Riffs on Prog Rock

Posted by on Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:02 AM

Being a prog-rock fan in 2012 is a lonely business. As someone who co-hosts a monthly prog-rock DJ night at the Living Room, I’m profoundly aware of the apathy, if not downright disdain, that prog inspires in the majority of the population. So it’s shocking to see Slate devote a long article to the genre a great many people despise, even though they possess only the most superficial knowledge of it.

David Weigel of Slate is writing what looks like a series on prog, powered by the kicker, “The ever-so-brief rise, and the inevitable fall, of the world’s most hated pop music.” Oh, damn, I’m hooked.

In this piece, Weigel focuses on Keith Emerson, flamboyant and über-talented keyboardist for the Nice and Emerson Lake & Palmer, and provides a concise summary of prog’s origins and trajectory from innovative force to creative slump and laughing stock of the rock-crit establishment.

Here are some key passages:

You can’t completely kill an art form. Even if a musical genre becomes despised, it endures—on master tapes, on cut-out LPs, on Spotify or MP3-trade fora. Simon Reynolds describes how the “massive, super-available archive” gifted to us by the Internet allows anyone to rediscover anything, and pop music to gnaw its own tail. Hip-hop artists, our cultural magpies, comb through prog’s greatest hits to sample its stranger riffs and lost organ bleats. Modern, prog-influenced acts like Dream Theater and Porcupine Tree can sell out midsized venues.

But if ever a form of popular music dropped dead suddenly, it was prog. Progressive rock essentially disappeared, and has remained in obscurity for 35 years, ridiculed by rock snobs, ignored by fans, its most famous artists—Yes, King Crimson, ELP, Jethro Tull—catchphrases for pretentious excess. …

The laugh-and-gawk-and-parody approach is fun but doesn’t explain why this music was popular, much less why critics liked it. Progressive rock, in its various forms, evolved out of psychedelia, out of classical music, and out of jazz fusion. In every case, its practitioners became obsessed with sounds and technologies and song structures and took them as far as they could. Pop songs became four- or five-part pop symphonies, with preludes and codas and repeating themes. Wasn’t this where music was supposed to go?

Preach it, brother! Maybe Weigel's post will convert a few adventurous souls out there. One can dream. Read the whole thing here and get some ELP after the cut.

 

Comments (2) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
nipper 1
Currently most metal and what passes as contemporary hardcore IS prog.

"In every case, its practitioners became obsessed with sounds and technologies and song structures and took them as far as they could."

Exactly, and I dont think prog has ever been more relevant.
Posted by nipper on August 14, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Matt from Denver 2
I think prog is making a comeback, at least in the form of appreciation for the original bands. The Onion's AV Club had a good writeup about them a couple of months ago. Rolling Stone published a readers poll of the best prog albums last month. Now Slate.

And @ 1 is completely on the mark about modern metal. When Tim Yohannon banned everything but simple punk/HC from Maximum Rock n Roll in the 90s, he specifically cited Neurosis as an example of a band who no longer fit the definition and called them "prog" instead. This at a time when "Souls at Zero" was their most recent LP.
Posted by Matt from Denver on August 15, 2012 at 6:40 AM

Add a comment

 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy